Records Request Feedback
Transparency in practice: request ease, response time, and answer usefulness.
4 questions · 1 page · about 2 minutes to answer · fully editable after you start
Freedom-of-information regimes are measured by statute and experienced by requesters. This feedback reviews the practice: request submission ease, acknowledgement and timeline adherence, and the answer's actual responsiveness – full, partial, or artfully evasive – plus fee reasonableness where charged.
The distinction between compliance and responsiveness is the entire point of running this. An organisation can hit every statutory deadline, answer within scope, and still leave every requester feeling stonewalled – and no compliance dashboard will ever show it, because the statistics it reports are the ones the statute defines.
The answered-what-I-asked score is the transparency truth: technically compliant responses that dodge the question are logged here. Watch the refusal-explanation answers especially – a refusal that requesters understand costs the organisation very little trust, while the same refusal delivered as an unexplained exemption reference generates appeals, journalism, and the impression that something is being hidden even when nothing is.
Template preview
This is a picture of every question as a respondent would see it, so nothing on it can be clicked or typed into. Use this template to get your own editable copy.
Opens in the Classic theme, or in your own default theme if you have set one — change it anytime to any of the 4 built-in looks, or build your own on a paid plan.
Page 1
Your information request
This survey asks how we handled your records request. Your answers help us improve how we respond to the public. It takes about 2 minutes. If you need help with a specific matter, please contact us directly, as this form may not be read straight away.
Q1.How would you rate each part of how your request was handled?*
| Poor | OK | Good | Not applicable | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ease of submitting the request | ||||
| Acknowledgement of your request | ||||
| Updates on progress | ||||
| Meeting the statutory timeline | ||||
| The response answering what you asked |
Q2.Your outcome?*
- Full response
- Partial/redacted
- Refused
- Still waiting past deadline
Q3.Did the explanation for what was withheld make sense?
Asked only if the answer to Q2 is “Partial/redacted” or “Refused”.
Q4.Based on this request - how transparent does the organisation feel?
More Government & Public Sector templates
Browse all Government & Public Sector templates
Roadworks Communication Survey
The cones' PR: warning adequacy, diversion sense, and timeline honesty.
School District Parent Survey
District-level parent confidence: quality, communication, facilities, and priorities.
Town Hall Meeting Feedback
Public meetings measured: heard fairly, answered honestly, and worth attending again.