Measure safety culture before the incident report does
Incident statistics measure what already went wrong. The shortcuts everyone knows about and nobody reports live in a layer official numbers never reach.
The short way: An anonymous climate check — reporting comfort, pressure to cut corners, near-miss awareness — that surfaces the risk before it becomes a statistic.
Ready-made templates for this
Prefer to start from a questionnaire rather than a description? These are already written.
Type this — that’s the whole job
“An anonymous workplace safety survey: comfort reporting issues, pressure to skip procedures, near-misses seen this quarter, one thing that would make work safer”
Build it now — freeNo setup, no tutorial. The words above go with you — review what the AI builds, then share the link.
How it works — three steps
- 1
Describe your environment (site, plant, fleet); the AI tunes the questions to it.
- 2
Anonymous collection on — this survey is worthless without it.
- 3
Run it quarterly with the periodic cadence; compare reporting comfort quarter by quarter with a date filter.
What’s doing the work
Anonymous collection
No IP address or identity saved with the answer — the precondition for anyone admitting to shortcuts.
Periodic responses
The same link runs every quarter; the same person counts once per wave.
Act rules
A 'not comfortable reporting' rating can email you. On an anonymous survey the email says what was answered, never who — but in a small team a same-day alert can still point to one person, so there use the once-a-day response alert on the Collect tab instead.
Questions people ask
Will people really admit to unsafe shortcuts?
Anonymously and in aggregate, yes — 'have you seen', rather than 'have you done', unlocks honest numbers.
How does this relate to our incident reporting system?
It measures the culture around that system — a climate survey telling you people fear reporting explains why the incident numbers look suspiciously good.
Minutes, not weeks. That’s the deal.
Start free