Skip to main content

Check on new hires at 30, 60 and 90 days — while the gaps are still fixable

Most companies discover their onboarding is broken in exit interviews, eleven months after the fixable moment. New hires won't volunteer problems; they need to be asked.

The short way: Three short check-ins — expectations vs reality, tools and access, manager support — asked at the milestones where honest answers are still cheap to act on.

Ready-made templates for this

Prefer to start from a questionnaire rather than a description? These are already written.

Type this — that’s the whole job

“A 30-day new hire check-in: how reality compares to expectations, whether they have what they need, and how supported they feel”

Build it now — free

Free to start. The Pro plan adds email invitations. Compare plans

No setup, no tutorial. The words above go with you — review what the AI builds, then share the link.

How it works — three steps

  1. 1

    Describe your onboarding stages; the AI drafts a check-in tuned to the 30-day mark.

  2. 2

    Duplicate it for 60 and 90 days — each copy takes one click and a small reword.

  3. 3

    Invite each cohort from your contact list as they hit the milestone.

What’s doing the work

Email invitationsPro

Personal links track who has answered, and reminders nudge only the silent.

Survey copy

The 60- and 90-day variants are one-click duplicates with the timeframe reworded.

Comment fields

Every scale carries an optional 'say more' — where the real onboarding gaps surface.

Questions people ask

Should onboarding check-ins be anonymous?

At 30/60/90 days, named works better — the point is to fix this hire's blockers. Keep anonymity for org-wide engagement measures.

Who should see the answers?

The manager and HR, quickly. Add them to the link's response alerts and they hear within minutes that a check-in is in; in a Business team workspace they can open it themselves.

Minutes, not weeks. That’s the deal.

Start free

Free to start. The Pro plan adds email invitations.