Youth Ministry Parent Survey
Parents on the youth programme: safety, communication, and what their teens say at home.
4 questions · 1 page · about 2 minutes to answer · fully editable after you start
Youth ministry has two audiences: the teens present and the parents entrusting them. This parent survey measures the trust side – safeguarding confidence, communication about events and content, leader accessibility – and taps the intelligence parents uniquely hold: what their teenagers actually say about the programme at home.
The says-at-home answers outrank any teen survey completed in the room; the car ride home is where youth programmes are truly reviewed.
Template preview
This is a picture of every question as a respondent would see it, so nothing on it can be clicked or typed into. Use this template to get your own editable copy.
Opens in the Light theme, or in your own default theme if you have set one — change it anytime to any of the 4 built-in looks, or build your own on a paid plan.
Page 1
Your teen and the programme
This survey asks how the youth programme is going for you and your teenager. Your answers help us improve it. It takes about 2 minutes.
Q1.How do you feel about each part of the youth ministry?*
| Concerned | OK | Confident | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Confidence in safeguarding | |||
| Confidence in supervision | |||
| Communication with parents | |||
| Leader accessibility to you | |||
| Content appropriateness |
Q2.How does your teen talk about the programme at home?*
- Enthusiastically
- Positively when asked
- Neutrally
- Reluctant to attend
Q3.What has the programme given your teenager, from what you see?
Q4.Any concern you have hesitated to raise?
More Religious Organisations templates
Browse all Religious Organisations templates
Facility Use Request
Community bookings of your space: purpose, date, needs, and agreement to house rules.
Faith Community Feedback Survey
Services, community life, and pastoral care - heard from the congregation.
Giving & Stewardship Survey
An anonymous read on giving barriers, transparency trust, and communication preferences.