Skip to main content

Let users rank the roadmap — with trade-offs on

Upvote boards reward whoever mobilises a mob, and 'rate importance 1–5' surveys return a wall of 5s. Neither survives contact with a quarter's actual capacity.

The short way: Forced rankings and 100-point budget allocations across candidate features — priority with trade-offs baked in, segmentable by the customers who pay most.

Ready-made templates for this

Prefer to start from a questionnaire rather than a description? These are already written.

Type this — that’s the whole job

“A feature prioritisation survey: rank these six roadmap candidates, then split 100 points across them by how much each matters”

Build it now — free

Free to start. The Pro plan adds segment cross-tabs. Compare plans

No setup, no tutorial. The words above go with you — review what the AI builds, then share the link.

How it works — three steps

  1. 1

    List the candidates; the AI builds ranking + fixed-sum allocation.

  2. 2

    Send to customer segments separately — enterprise and free users vote differently.

  3. 3

    The allocation totals by segment ARE the roadmap meeting's opening slide.

What’s doing the work

Fixed-sum allocation

Spending 100 points forces the trade-off an upvote never faces.

Ranking questions

A forced order per respondent aggregates into a defensible priority list.

Segment cross-tabsPro

What the paying tier wants vs what the free tier wants — the tension made visible.

Questions people ask

How is this better than our public voting board?

Boards measure mobilisation; this measures considered trade-offs from a sample YOU choose — run both, but budget by this one.

Should we include 'something else' as an option?

Yes — an Other write-in catches the candidate you didn't shortlist, and one AI run themes the write-ins.

Minutes, not weeks. That’s the deal.

Start free

Free to start. The Pro plan adds segment cross-tabs.