Usability answers without the lab booking
Lab studies cost weeks and five participants; analytics shows where users went but not what they were trying to do. The middle path — many users, task framing — rarely gets run.
The short way: Dozens of users attempting your real tasks unmoderated — completion rates, difficulty scores and where-it-went-wrong verbatims per task, within days.
Ready-made templates for this
Prefer to start from a questionnaire rather than a description? These are already written.
Usability Test Follow-up Survey
Product & UX
Post-session ratings that quantify what the moderator observed.
Navigation Findability Test
Product & UX
Where would you look? Test your menu labels before you ship them.
Onboarding Flow Feedback Survey
Product & UX
Where new users hesitated, what they skipped, and when value first appeared.
Accessibility Experience Survey
Product & UX
Hear directly from users with access needs about what blocks them.
Type this — that’s the whole job
“A usability test survey: try to find and change your notification settings, then report success, difficulty 1-5, and where you got stuck”
Build it now — freeNo setup, no tutorial. The words above go with you — review what the AI builds, then share the link.
How it works — three steps
- 1
Frame two or three real tasks; the AI structures attempt-then-report flows.
- 2
Send to a slice of real users on their own devices.
- 3
If task 2 comes in at, for example, a 40% completion rate, that rate and its stuck-points ARE the design sprint brief.
What’s doing the work
Descriptive task blocks
Task framing sits between question groups exactly where the method needs it.
Per-task difficulty scores
SEQ-style single-ease scoring, comparable across tasks and releases.
Open stuck-point theming
Where users derailed clusters into the fix list.
Questions people ask
Is unmoderated self-report valid?
For finding WHERE friction is, strongly — completion + difficulty + verbatims triangulate well. For deep WHY, follow up with two moderated sessions aimed by these results.
How many participants per task?
30+ gives stable completion rates; the classic five-user lab wisdom applies to observation, not self-report rates.
Minutes, not weeks. That’s the deal.
Start free