Run an ethics-ready research questionnaire
Research surveys need what generic tools bolt on badly: enforced consent before any data, anonymity that will survive an ethics-board question, and export that doesn't need a cleaning script.
The short way: A questionnaire where consent structurally precedes data, responses can be collected with no IP address or identity saved alongside them, and the dataset exports analysis-ready — the ethics application writes itself.
Ready-made templates for this
Prefer to start from a questionnaire rather than a description? These are already written.
Informed Consent Acknowledgement
Healthcare & Wellness
A structured consent record: understanding confirmed, questions invited, signed and dated.
Diary Study Daily Check-in
Market Research
Longitudinal research entries: today's usage, context, friction, and mood.
Focus Group Screener
Market Research
Recruit the right room: category usage, articulacy check, and conflicts screened.
Type this — that’s the whole job
“A research questionnaire on remote work and burnout: consent statement first, validated wellbeing scale items, work pattern questions, demographics last”
Build it now — freeFree to start. The Pro plan adds consent gate. Compare plans
No setup, no tutorial. The words above go with you — review what the AI builds, then share the link.
How it works — three steps
- 1
Describe your instrument (paste scale items if you have them); the AI structures pages in research order.
- 2
Consent gate on — no acceptance, no stored data, recorded per response — and Anonymous responses on for the link.
- 3
Export the anonymised dataset to CSV for your stats package.
What’s doing the work
Consent gatePro
Storage is impossible before acceptance — the claim your ethics form makes, enforced by machine.
Anonymous collection
No IP address, browser details or identity link are saved with a response — done by the product when the response is saved, not left to policy. Routine server logs are separate (see the Privacy Policy).
SPSS-ready export
An SPSS .sav with short variable names, question and value labels, and one column per item — no renaming session.
Questions people ask
Will this satisfy an ethics board?
The mechanics they probe — enforced consent, structural anonymity, retention deletion, no third-party AI on responses by default — are all built in and documentable. Your protocol still does the arguing.
Can participants withdraw after submitting?
With anonymous data there is nothing saved with a response to trace it back to a person; if your design needs withdrawal, use a participant-generated code question and delete on request by code.