Skip to main content

Measure resident satisfaction across every council service

Residents' opinions surface at council meetings and election day, filtered through whoever shows up. The services quietly failing specific neighbourhoods stay invisible in city-wide averages.

The short way: A service-by-service satisfaction read — waste, roads, parks, permits — split by district and language community, so budget follows evidence.

Ready-made templates for this

Prefer to start from a questionnaire rather than a description? These are already written.

Type this — that’s the whole job

“A resident satisfaction survey rating waste collection, road maintenance, parks, and permit services, with a district question”

Build it now — free

Free to start. The Pro plan adds multi-language surveys and cross-tabulation. Compare plans

No setup, no tutorial. The words above go with you — review what the AI builds, then share the link.

How it works — three steps

  1. 1

    List your services; the AI drafts a rating grid plus a district selector.

  2. 2

    Add the languages your community actually speaks.

  3. 3

    Publish the link on your site and QR it in facilities; cross-tab by district.

What’s doing the work

Multi-language surveysPro

Civic legitimacy requires answering in your own language — one survey serves them all.

Matrix ratings

Ten services in one grid keeps a civic survey under five minutes.

Cross-tabulationPro

Satisfaction by district is the map the budget meeting needs.

Questions people ask

How do we reach residents who aren't online?

Staff-assisted entry: officers key in phone and paper responses through manual data entry, and those join the same dataset.

Should civic surveys be anonymous?

Yes for candour, with an optional contact field for case follow-up — both at once is a standard setup here.

Minutes, not weeks. That’s the deal.

Start free

Free to start. The Pro plan adds multi-language surveys and cross-tabulation.