Measure IT, HR and Finance service the way you'd measure a vendor
Internal departments never hear structured feedback — just hallway grumbling and the occasional escalation. Without numbers, budget conversations become opinion contests.
The short way: A standing satisfaction measure per internal service — responsiveness, effort, quality — comparable quarter by quarter and ready for the budget meeting.
Ready-made templates for this
Prefer to start from a questionnaire rather than a description? These are already written.
IT Helpdesk Satisfaction Survey
IT & Support
Per-ticket internal IT feedback: first-contact fix, self-service gaps, and downtime cost.
Payroll Service Satisfaction Survey
Finance & Professional Services
Accuracy, timeliness, and support - the service where errors are personal.
Internal Communications Survey
Human Resources
Which channels reach people, what gets missed, and how informed employees actually feel.
Type this — that’s the whole job
“An internal service satisfaction survey for our IT helpdesk: speed, ease, quality of resolution, and one improvement suggestion”
Build it now — freeFree to start. The Pro plan adds multiple collectors. Compare plans
No setup, no tutorial. The words above go with you — review what the AI builds, then share the link.
How it works — three steps
- 1
Name the department and its services; the AI shapes the standard service dimensions.
- 2
One collector per department keeps league tables honest.
- 3
Run it quarterly; export each quarter for the ops review.
What’s doing the work
Multiple collectorsPro
IT, HR and Finance each get their own stream from one shared instrument.
Excel export
The quarterly numbers drop straight into the ops review pack.
Link variables
Or skip the quarterly rhythm entirely — put the link in each closed internal ticket's email, tagged with the ticket.
Questions people ask
Departments fear a public league table — how do we start?
Start each department privately with its own trend. Comparison can come a few quarters in, once the numbers are owned rather than feared.
Anonymous or named for internal feedback?
Anonymous for the score, with an optional 'contact me' field — you get honesty and a follow-up path.