Skip to main content

Score suppliers on evidence, annually and identically

Supplier reviews happen in renewal-week panic, scored from memory by whoever's available. The vendor everyone privately complains about keeps passing because nothing was written down.

The short way: Every stakeholder scoring every supplier on the same criteria — a ranked vendor table with the complaints finally attached to evidence.

Ready-made templates for this

Prefer to start from a questionnaire rather than a description? These are already written.

Type this — that’s the whole job

“A supplier evaluation: on-time delivery, quality consistency, issue responsiveness, commercial flexibility, would you renew”

Build it now — free

Free to start. The Pro plan adds per-collector suppliers and annual comparison. Compare plans

No setup, no tutorial. The words above go with you — review what the AI builds, then share the link.

How it works — three steps

  1. 1

    Define your criteria once; the AI builds the scoring form.

  2. 2

    Each stakeholder scores each supplier — one collector per supplier keeps files clean.

  3. 3

    The ranked table and per-supplier verbatims feed the renewal decisions.

What’s doing the work

Matrix scoring

Five criteria per supplier in one grid — a two-minute task stakeholders actually complete.

Per-collector suppliersPro

Each vendor's file accumulates separately; filter by collector to compare them.

Annual comparisonPro

This year vs last year per supplier — improvement claims get checked.

Questions people ask

Should suppliers see their scores?

Sharing a summarised scorecard in the review meeting turns the evaluation into leverage — the PDF export is built for exactly that table.

How many evaluators per supplier?

Three to five who actually touch the relationship — procurement, the receiving team, quality. One voice is an opinion; five is a signal.

Minutes, not weeks. That’s the deal.

Start free

Free to start. The Pro plan adds per-collector suppliers and annual comparison.